Page 11 - Water Standards

fails to pass acceptance, it shall not proceed with follow-up work or
handover for commissioning.
1. 0. 7 A government acceptance shall be the responsibility of
the acceptance committee established by the presiding organiza-
tion, while a legal person acceptance shall be the responsibility of
the acceptance working group set up by the legal person of the
project. The acceptance committee (or working group) shall be
formed by the representatives and experts from relevant organi-
zations.
The acceptance appraisal report is the qualification document
for acceptance, and shall be signed by all members of the accept-
ance committee (or working group). Any reserved comments
on the conclusions shall be clearly recorded and signed in the ap-
praisal report of acceptance.
1. 0. 8 Acceptance conclusions shall be approved by at least two
thirds of all members of the acceptance committee (or working
group).
Principles of solving problems found in the acceptance shall
be consulted and ascertained by the acceptance committee (or
working group). The chairman (or group leader) is authorized
to give a final verdict on controversial issues. If over half of the
members disagree with the verdict, it shall be referred to the su-
pervision and management institution for a final decision in case
of the legal person acceptance and shall be referred to the presid-
ing organization for a decision in case of the government accept-
ance.
1. 0. 9 Concluding remarks shall be given specifically to the pro-
ject quality after the inspection and assessment process.
1. 0. 10 Preparation of acceptance documentation shall be organ-
ized by the project legal person. Relevant organizations shall